page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7 page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
< prev - next > Crop processing Drying KnO 100217_how_use_dryit_tray_dryer (Printable PDF)
How to use the DRYIT semi-continuous tray dryer
Practical Action
The basic aim of any industrial processing operation is to make sure that the value being
added per ton of production is greater than the total of all the costs involved in producing and
selling it.
In the case of drying the main production cost areas needing consideration are:
Raw material cost per unit of usable raw material
The product drying ratio i.e. kg of dry product from 100 kg fresh material
Fuel costs
Labour
Packaging
Equipment costs and depreciation
Distribution, marketing etc
Rent
Overheads
While a full analysis of all the above is essential to develop a business plan this section will
concentrate on the first four areas as they involve crop processing and technical selections
that conventional business advisors may not be able to provide.
Raw material cost per unit of usable raw material
No incoming raw material will be totally usable; there is always some wastage through second
grade and damaged material and preparation (skinning, stoning, selecting etc) prior to drying.
It is recommended that a quantity of raw material is purchased, weighed and then prepared
for the dryer.
Wt. Fresh material x cost/kg = cost /kg prepared material
Wt. prepared material
This preparation ration can vary through two main factors. Firstly, the nature and variety of
the raw material and, secondly, the quality delivered by the supplier. It may therefore be
useful to examine both these aspects.
For example, in the production of dry mango a quantity of 3 varieties were purchased from 3
different suppliers and the following test was carried out.
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supplier C
% of damaged, low grade fruit rejected
Variety 1
Variety 2
10 8
86
13 11
Variety 3
14
10
20
This indicates that supplier B is likely to be more reliable and also that variety 3 is more
susceptible to damage.
7